As9f2abc75accidentally got the ordering of some of the includes wrong, I decided to propose my initial solution again. Additional to that, I've opened a MR against CMocka to solve this on their side, since I believe that the current way this is done is not sustainable [0]. [0] https://gitlab.com/cmocka/cmocka/-/merge_requests/91 Fixes:9f2abc75("Fix tests with gcc15 (uintptr_t)") Signed-off-by: Steffen Jaeckel <s@jaeckel.eu> CProof note: our new tests need to also be updated.
53 lines
1.3 KiB
C
53 lines
1.3 KiB
C
#include <string.h>
|
|
#include "prof_cmocka.h"
|
|
#include <stdlib.h>
|
|
|
|
#include "xmpp/chat_session.h"
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
returns_false_when_chat_session_does_not_exist(void** state)
|
|
{
|
|
ChatSession* session = chat_session_get("somejid@server.org");
|
|
assert_null(session);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
creates_chat_session_on_recipient_activity(void** state)
|
|
{
|
|
char* barejid = "myjid@server.org";
|
|
char* resource = "tablet";
|
|
|
|
chat_session_recipient_active(barejid, resource, FALSE);
|
|
ChatSession* session = chat_session_get(barejid);
|
|
|
|
assert_non_null(session);
|
|
assert_string_equal(session->resource, resource);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
replaces_chat_session_on_recipient_activity_with_different_resource(void** state)
|
|
{
|
|
char* barejid = "myjid@server.org";
|
|
char* resource1 = "tablet";
|
|
char* resource2 = "mobile";
|
|
|
|
chat_session_recipient_active(barejid, resource1, FALSE);
|
|
chat_session_recipient_active(barejid, resource2, FALSE);
|
|
ChatSession* session = chat_session_get(barejid);
|
|
|
|
assert_string_equal(session->resource, resource2);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
removes_chat_session(void** state)
|
|
{
|
|
char* barejid = "myjid@server.org";
|
|
char* resource1 = "laptop";
|
|
|
|
chat_session_recipient_active(barejid, resource1, FALSE);
|
|
chat_session_remove(barejid);
|
|
ChatSession* session = chat_session_get(barejid);
|
|
|
|
assert_null(session);
|
|
}
|