Unify coding style
@sjaeckel integrated clang-format with formal coding style. Run his script and commit changes. There are pros and cons of this commit. Mixed coding style is a "broken window". A good single style simplifies reading and writing code. On the other hand, this is a big change which will lead to conflicts.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
|
||||
* TLS implementation with OpenSSL.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
#include <errno.h> /* EINTR */
|
||||
#include <errno.h> /* EINTR */
|
||||
#include <string.h>
|
||||
|
||||
#ifndef _WIN32
|
||||
@@ -39,11 +39,11 @@
|
||||
#if (defined LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER && OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER == 0x20000000L)
|
||||
#undef OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER
|
||||
#if (LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER >= 0x2080000fL)
|
||||
#define OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER 0x1010000fL
|
||||
#define OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER 0x1010000fL
|
||||
#elif (LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER >= 0x2070000fL)
|
||||
#define OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER 0x1000200fL
|
||||
#define OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER 0x1000200fL
|
||||
#else
|
||||
#define OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER 0x1000107fL
|
||||
#define OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER 0x1000107fL
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -169,9 +169,11 @@ tls_t *tls_new(xmpp_conn_t *conn)
|
||||
* Allow only complete wildcards. RFC 6125 discourages wildcard usage
|
||||
* completely, and lists internationalized domain names as a reason
|
||||
* against partial wildcards.
|
||||
* See https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6125#section-7.2 for more information.
|
||||
* See https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6125#section-7.2 for more
|
||||
* information.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_hostflags(param, X509_CHECK_FLAG_NO_PARTIAL_WILDCARDS);
|
||||
X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_hostflags(param,
|
||||
X509_CHECK_FLAG_NO_PARTIAL_WILDCARDS);
|
||||
X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_host(param, conn->domain, 0);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -271,10 +273,9 @@ int tls_stop(tls_t *tls)
|
||||
|
||||
int tls_is_recoverable(int error)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return (error == SSL_ERROR_NONE || error == SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ
|
||||
|| error == SSL_ERROR_WANT_WRITE
|
||||
|| error == SSL_ERROR_WANT_CONNECT
|
||||
|| error == SSL_ERROR_WANT_ACCEPT);
|
||||
return (error == SSL_ERROR_NONE || error == SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ ||
|
||||
error == SSL_ERROR_WANT_WRITE || error == SSL_ERROR_WANT_CONNECT ||
|
||||
error == SSL_ERROR_WANT_ACCEPT);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int tls_pending(tls_t *tls)
|
||||
@@ -282,7 +283,7 @@ int tls_pending(tls_t *tls)
|
||||
return SSL_pending(tls->ssl);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int tls_read(tls_t *tls, void * const buff, const size_t len)
|
||||
int tls_read(tls_t *tls, void *const buff, const size_t len)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -292,7 +293,7 @@ int tls_read(tls_t *tls, void * const buff, const size_t len)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int tls_write(tls_t *tls, const void * const buff, const size_t len)
|
||||
int tls_write(tls_t *tls, const void *const buff, const size_t len)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -315,7 +316,8 @@ static void _tls_sock_wait(tls_t *tls, int error)
|
||||
int nfds;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
if (error == SSL_ERROR_NONE) return;
|
||||
if (error == SSL_ERROR_NONE)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
FD_ZERO(&rfds);
|
||||
FD_ZERO(&wfds);
|
||||
@@ -323,8 +325,9 @@ static void _tls_sock_wait(tls_t *tls, int error)
|
||||
FD_SET(tls->sock, &rfds);
|
||||
if (error == SSL_ERROR_WANT_WRITE)
|
||||
FD_SET(tls->sock, &wfds);
|
||||
nfds = (error == SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ || error == SSL_ERROR_WANT_WRITE) ?
|
||||
tls->sock + 1 : 0;
|
||||
nfds = (error == SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ || error == SSL_ERROR_WANT_WRITE)
|
||||
? tls->sock + 1
|
||||
: 0;
|
||||
do {
|
||||
tv.tv_sec = TLS_TIMEOUT_SEC;
|
||||
tv.tv_usec = TLS_TIMEOUT_USEC;
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user