devs/libstrophe-gh
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Unify coding style

Browse Source 
@sjaeckel integrated clang-format with formal coding style. Run his
script and commit changes.

There are pros and cons of this commit.

Mixed coding style is a "broken window". A good single style simplifies
reading and writing code.

On the other hand, this is a big change which will lead to conflicts.
This commit is contained in:
Dmitry Podgorny
2020-01-03 22:02:22 +02:00
parent eef07cef36
commit 562a06425b
62 changed files with 3972 additions and 3746 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

110
tests/test_snprintf.c
View File

@@ -16,76 +16,50 @@
#define LONG_STRING 1024
#endif
int main (void)
int main(void)
{
char buf1[LONG_STRING];
char buf2[LONG_STRING];
char *fp_fmt[] = {
"%-1.5f",
"%1.5f",
"%123.9f",
"%10.5f",
"% 10.5f",
"%+22.9f",
"%+4.9f",
"%01.3f",
"%4f",
"%3.1f",
"%3.2f",
"%.0f",
"%.1f",
NULL
};
double fp_nums[] = { -1.5, 134.21, 91340.2, 341.1234, 0203.9, 0.96, 0.996,
0.9996, 1.996, 4.136, 0};
char *int_fmt[] = {
"%-1.5d",
"%1.5d",
"%123.9d",
"%5.5d",
"%10.5d",
"% 10.5d",
"%+22.33d",
"%01.3d",
"%4d",
"0x%x",
"0x%04x",
NULL
};
long int_nums[] = { -1, 134, 91340, 341, 0203, 0x76543210, 0};
int x, y;
int fail = 0;
int num = 0;
char buf1[LONG_STRING];
char buf2[LONG_STRING];
char *fp_fmt[] = {"%-1.5f", "%1.5f", "%123.9f", "%10.5f", "% 10.5f",
"%+22.9f", "%+4.9f", "%01.3f", "%4f", "%3.1f",
"%3.2f", "%.0f", "%.1f", NULL};
double fp_nums[] = {-1.5, 134.21, 91340.2, 341.1234, 0203.9, 0.96,
0.996, 0.9996, 1.996, 4.136, 0};
char *int_fmt[] = {"%-1.5d", "%1.5d", "%123.9d", "%5.5d",
"%10.5d", "% 10.5d", "%+22.33d", "%01.3d",
"%4d", "0x%x", "0x%04x", NULL};
long int_nums[] = {-1, 134, 91340, 341, 0203, 0x76543210, 0};
int x, y;
int fail = 0;
int num = 0;
printf ("Testing xmpp_snprintf format codes against system sprintf...\n");
printf("Testing xmpp_snprintf format codes against system sprintf...\n");
for (x = 0; fp_fmt[x] != NULL ; x++)
for (y = 0; fp_nums[y] != 0 ; y++)
{
xmpp_snprintf (buf1, sizeof (buf1), fp_fmt[x], fp_nums[y]);
sprintf (buf2, fp_fmt[x], fp_nums[y]);
if (strcmp (buf1, buf2))
{
printf("xmpp_snprintf doesn't match Format: %s\n\txmpp_snprintf = %s\n\tsprintf = %s\n",
fp_fmt[x], buf1, buf2);
fail++;
}
num++;
}
for (x = 0; fp_fmt[x] != NULL; x++)
for (y = 0; fp_nums[y] != 0; y++) {
xmpp_snprintf(buf1, sizeof(buf1), fp_fmt[x], fp_nums[y]);
sprintf(buf2, fp_fmt[x], fp_nums[y]);
if (strcmp(buf1, buf2)) {
printf("xmpp_snprintf doesn't match Format: "
"%s\n\txmpp_snprintf = %s\n\tsprintf = %s\n",
fp_fmt[x], buf1, buf2);
fail++;
}
num++;
}
for (x = 0; int_fmt[x] != NULL ; x++)
for (y = 0; int_nums[y] != 0 ; y++)
{
xmpp_snprintf (buf1, sizeof (buf1), int_fmt[x], int_nums[y]);
sprintf (buf2, int_fmt[x], int_nums[y]);
if (strcmp (buf1, buf2))
{
printf("xmpp_snprintf doesn't match Format: %s\n\txmpp_snprintf = %s\n\tsprintf = %s\n",
int_fmt[x], buf1, buf2);
fail++;
}
num++;
}
printf ("%d tests failed out of %d.\n", fail, num);
return fail != 0 ? 1 : 0;
for (x = 0; int_fmt[x] != NULL; x++)
for (y = 0; int_nums[y] != 0; y++) {
xmpp_snprintf(buf1, sizeof(buf1), int_fmt[x], int_nums[y]);
sprintf(buf2, int_fmt[x], int_nums[y]);
if (strcmp(buf1, buf2)) {
printf("xmpp_snprintf doesn't match Format: "
"%s\n\txmpp_snprintf = %s\n\tsprintf = %s\n",
int_fmt[x], buf1, buf2);
fail++;
}
num++;
}
printf("%d tests failed out of %d.\n", fail, num);
return fail != 0 ? 1 : 0;
}