From e7f87c652e9e8f169e6345d7d609e548d8fe2ae8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dmitry Podgorny Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2014 22:32:16 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] tls_schannel: [style] use LF for EOL, not CR+LF --- src/tls_schannel.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/tls_schannel.c b/src/tls_schannel.c index 71b0ab0..6633be7 100644 --- a/src/tls_schannel.c +++ b/src/tls_schannel.c @@ -75,11 +75,11 @@ tls_t *tls_new(xmpp_ctx_t *ctx, sock_t sock) SecPkgCred_CipherStrengths spc_cs; SecPkgCred_SupportedProtocols spc_sp; - OSVERSIONINFO osvi; - - memset(&osvi, 0, sizeof(osvi)); - osvi.dwOSVersionInfoSize = sizeof(osvi); - + OSVERSIONINFO osvi; + + memset(&osvi, 0, sizeof(osvi)); + osvi.dwOSVersionInfoSize = sizeof(osvi); + GetVersionEx(&osvi); /* no TLS support on win9x/me, despite what anyone says */ @@ -148,26 +148,26 @@ tls_t *tls_new(xmpp_ctx_t *ctx, sock_t sock) /* This bunch of queries should trip up wine until someone fixes * schannel support there */ - ret = tls->sft->QueryCredentialsAttributes(&(tls->hcred), SECPKG_ATTR_SUPPORTED_ALGS, &spc_sa); - if (ret != SEC_E_OK) - { - tls_free(tls); - return NULL; - } - - ret = tls->sft->QueryCredentialsAttributes(&(tls->hcred), SECPKG_ATTR_CIPHER_STRENGTHS, &spc_cs); - if (ret != SEC_E_OK) - { - tls_free(tls); - return NULL; - } - - ret = tls->sft->QueryCredentialsAttributes(&(tls->hcred), SECPKG_ATTR_SUPPORTED_PROTOCOLS, &spc_sp); - if (ret != SEC_E_OK) - { - tls_free(tls); - return NULL; - } + ret = tls->sft->QueryCredentialsAttributes(&(tls->hcred), SECPKG_ATTR_SUPPORTED_ALGS, &spc_sa); + if (ret != SEC_E_OK) + { + tls_free(tls); + return NULL; + } + + ret = tls->sft->QueryCredentialsAttributes(&(tls->hcred), SECPKG_ATTR_CIPHER_STRENGTHS, &spc_cs); + if (ret != SEC_E_OK) + { + tls_free(tls); + return NULL; + } + + ret = tls->sft->QueryCredentialsAttributes(&(tls->hcred), SECPKG_ATTR_SUPPORTED_PROTOCOLS, &spc_sp); + if (ret != SEC_E_OK) + { + tls_free(tls); + return NULL; + } return tls; }